Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqRWQEwX65mcT5hZczKJNpG01JA532M1p6RbuLuk1Uo75A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Ответы Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> There's also the consideration of what to do with stats *on the standby*. If
> we WAL log the stats file, then when it replays onthe standby, the stats
> there will be overwritten. And stats like number of index vs seq scans on
> the standby are still interesting and would be lost.

Perhaps it would make sense to separate the stat files by type then?
The action taken for each file depends on its type.
-- 
Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Albe Laurenz
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: UNDO and in-place update
Следующее
От: Rushabh Lathia
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Push down more UPDATEs/DELETEs in postgres_fdw