Re: [HACKERS] patch proposal

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [HACKERS] patch proposal
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqRVCH95MQ8dQgCrRzQmwiX=dKDKyKYYVW=hj7YMM6r=wA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] patch proposal  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] patch proposal  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 7:22 AM, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
> 3) There are no tests.  I believe that
> src/test/recovery/t/006_logical_decoding.pl would be the best place to
> insert your tests.

003_recovery_targets.pl is the test for recovery targets. The routines
it has would be helpful.

> I'm marking this as "Waiting on Author", but honestly I think "Returned
> with Feedback" might be more appropriate.  I'll leave that up to the CFM.

We could wait a couple of days before that, this patch just got a
review. (Thanks!)
-- 
Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
Следующее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] src/test/README for logical replication