As I understand offline comments of Nikolay, current version of page inspect contains an mistake here. Should we backpatch this?
As far as I understood from the code, the current code in pageinspect is overestimating the length of t_bits. So that's actually harmless. For the sake of this patch though this is needed to perform the sanity checks in place when scanning raw page entries.
Чтобы сделать работу с сайтом удобнее, мы используем cookie и аналитический сервис «Яндекс.Метрика». Продолжая пользоваться сайтом, вы соглашаетесь с их использованием.