Re: Exposing PG_VERSION_NUM in pg_config

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Exposing PG_VERSION_NUM in pg_config
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqRLjSo4FhYoBkuArqULmH-9EeDKufe+UtNMLbmjTOtddw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Exposing PG_VERSION_NUM in pg_config  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Hm.  We're all agreed that there's a use case for exposing PG_VERSION_NUM
>> to the makefiles, but I did not hear one for adding it to pg_config; and
>> doing the former takes about two lines whereas adding a pg_config option
>> entails quite a lot of overhead (documentation, translatable help text,
>> yadda yadda).  So I'm not in favor of doing the latter without a much
>> more solid case than has been made.
>
> Well, I have no other cases than ones of the type mentioned upthread,
> and honestly I am fine as long as we do not apply maths to a version
> string. So attached is a patch that adds VERSION_NUM in
> Makefile.global.

Added entry in CF 2015-06 to not have this stuff fall into the void:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/5/203/
-- 
Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Rounding to even for numeric data type
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Rounding to even for numeric data type