Re: pg_restore multiple --function options

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: pg_restore multiple --function options
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqRKJu7V9etahdiKpPe37Khv8NsmKSM9aoFVwtr237K_tA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_restore multiple --function options  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Ответы Re: pg_restore multiple --function options
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:17 AM, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:29:06PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> While looking at the pg_restore code, I noticed that while it
>> supports specifying multiple --table options to restore several
>> tables, it does not support multiple --function options. Or --index,
>> --schema, or --trigger.
>>
>> The support for multiple --table options was added in 9.3, in
>> January. See
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAK3UJRG+yV1mK5twLfKVMCwXH4f6PnJou6Rn=ecabyfQH1vVHg@mail.gmail.com.
>> Was there a particular reason for only doing it for --table, or was
>> it just an oversight or lack of interest? No doubt that --table is
>> the most interesting one, but IMHO the other options should behave
>> the same, for the sake of consistency.
>
> +1 for making them consistent.  There will also be an improvement in
> usability.
+1. It would be good to have consistency there for all the objects.
-- 
Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Gierth
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs
Следующее
От: "yinminmin"
Дата:
Сообщение: [GENERAL] Call for translations