Re: [HACKERS] Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 7:36 AM, Karl O. Pinc <kop@meme.com> wrote:
> Maybe.  It's not user-supplied data that's corrupted but it is
> PG generated data which is generated for and supplied to the user.
> I just looked at all uses of XX001 and it is true that they all
> involve corruption of user-supplied data.
>
> If you don't want to use XX001 use XX000.  It does not seem worth
> making a new error code for just this one case.

Our ideas rather map here, ERRCODE_INTERNAL_ERROR would be adapted for
this situation. Do any of you want to give it a shot or should I?
-- 
Michael