Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqRCTU8zN4FjYQEk2qVHMCw-vDK2i7XrVGZkVGmNs63FtQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
Ответы Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
As you may have noticed, I committed this (after some more cleanup). Of course, feel free to still review it, and please point out any issues you may find.

This comment on top of XLogRecordAssemble is not adapted as page_writes_omitted does not exist. Perhaps this is a remnant of some older version of the patch?
 * If there are any registered buffers, and a full-page image was not taken
 * of all them, *page_writes_omitted is set to true. This signals that the
 * assembled record is only good for insertion on the assumption that the
 * RedoRecPtr and doPageWrites values were up-to-date.
 */
--
Michael

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Anssi Kääriäinen
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: alternative model for handling locking in parallel groups