Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqR=hUMk4HuHXSG=qO35vOEYue-98GPS_5Mp=REOSJva7A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Andrew Dunstan
<andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> This is really a pretty small patch all things considered, and pretty
> low-risk (although I haven;t been threough the code in fine detail yet).
> In the end I'm persuaded by Andres' point that there's actually no
> practical alternative way to make sure the data is actually synced to disk.
>
> If nobody else wants to pick it up I will, unless there is a strong
> objection.

Thanks!
-- 
Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)
Следующее
От: David Steele
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size