Re: Parallell Optimizer

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Parallell Optimizer
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqR4mtZH+Xxbq5WsMLtNXKWg_rJg8iSgWQc97+93fiEMmA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Parallell Optimizer  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Parallell Optimizer  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers



On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 5:04 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 7 June 2013 20:23, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> As for other databases, I suspect that ones that have parallel execution
> are probably doing it with a thread model not a process model.

Separate processes are more common because it covers the general case
where query execution is spread across multiple nodes. Threads don't
work across nodes and parallel queries predate (working) threading
models.
Indeed. Parallelism based on processes would be more convenient for master-master
type of applications. Even if no master-master feature is implemented directly in core,
 at least a parallelism infrastructure based on processes could be used for this purpose.
--
Michael

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ALTER TABLE ... ALTER CONSTRAINT
Следующее
От: Tatsuo Ishii
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Parallell Optimizer