On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Michael Paquier
>> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> > @Magnus: having the possibility to mark a patch as "returned with
>>> > feedback" without bumping it to the next CF automatically would be
>>> > cool to being moving on.
>>> Meh. "cool to have to help moving on".
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, it's at the top of my list of priorities once I get some time to
>> spend on community stuff. Hopefully I can get around to it next week. There
>> is a small chance I can do it before then, but it is indeed small...
>
>
> My apologies for that being delayed even longe rthan that. I've finally
> pushed the changes that:
>
> * Renames the current "returned with feedback" to "moved to next cf"
> * Adds a new status, "returned with feedback", that is the same as
> "rejected" in everything except the label (meaning it closes the patch out,
> but does *not* move it to the next CF).
>
> This was at least my understanding of the consensus :)
Thanks a lot for this! This looks neat to me.
--
Michael