Re: 9.4 checksum error in recovery with btree index

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: 9.4 checksum error in recovery with btree index
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqQzrQLHO6kgM5+SLa=nnDHsW1pVRg8_YPUM8pph3jXCxw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: 9.4 checksum error in recovery with btree index  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers



On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:10 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
What would be a good way of doing that?  Mostly I've just been sharing it on google drive when I find something.  Should I fork the mirror from github (https://github.com/postgres/postgres)?  Forking the entire codebase just to have a 200 line patch and 2 driving scripts seems excessive, but I guess that that is the git philosophy.  Or is there a better way than that?
When forking a repository for development purposes, usually the whole repository is not necessary: push only the master branch that you update from time to time and create separate branches for each development patch. If people would like to have a look at your patch, they would simply need to add a remote link to your fork, fetching only the diffs introduced by your additional branch(es) and then to checkout the branch on which your patch is. This has the advantage to let the user merge himself the code with newer code and not getting failures when applying a patch that will get chunks of code rejected over time.

My 2c.
--
Michael

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: jsonb failed assertions
Следующее
От: David Rowley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Allowing join removals for more join types