Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqQpmCAbLuRF0jX6hWDHzoQW43Mm+KzP-NOj5V1E_qqUUA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Michael Paquier
>> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> >> Okay, that argument I buy.
>> >>
>> >> I suppose this function/view should report no row at all if there is no
>> >> wal receiver connected, rather than a view with nulls.
>> >
>> > The function returns PG_RETURN_NULL() so as we don't have to use a
>> > SRF, and the view checks for IS NOT NULL, so there would be no rows
>> > popping up.
>>
>> In short, I would just go with the attached and call it a day.
>
> Done, thanks.

Thanks. I have noticed that the item was still in CLOSE_WAIT, so I
have moved it to the section of resolved items.
-- 
Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Gavin Flower
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: to_date_valid()
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: to_date_valid()