Inconsistencies in documentation of row-level locking

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Inconsistencies in documentation of row-level locking
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqQnxY7LxUYzFC8mfDZrufLrCijMA_-wXO1TKHsbkoWn+w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Inconsistencies in documentation of row-level locking
Re: Inconsistencies in documentation of row-level locking
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi all,

Currently all the row-level lock modes are described in the page for
SELECT query:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/explicit-locking.html#LOCKING-ROWS
However, after browsing the documentation, I noticed in the page
describing all the explicit locks of the system that there is a
portion dedicated to row-level locks and this section is not
mentioning at all FOR KEY SHARE and FOR NO KEY UPDATE. It seems that
this is something rather misleading for the user:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/explicit-locking.html#LOCKING-ROWS

Attached is a patch that refactors the whole and improves the documentation:
- Addition of a table showing the conflicts between each lock
- Moved description of each row-level lock mode to the explicit locking page
- Addition of a link in SELECT portion to redirect the user to the
explicit locking page
Regards,
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Claudio Freire
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Column Redaction
Следующее
От: "MauMau"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [9.4 bug] The database server hangs with write-heavy workload on Windows