Re: Re: Removing SSL renegotiation (Was: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Re: Removing SSL renegotiation (Was: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?)
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqQnjiDixR5qNJ86QnM++sKpyTedTNLF_vNPmVtu5xOZyQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: Removing SSL renegotiation (Was: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: Re: Removing SSL renegotiation (Was: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения


On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
On 2015-07-01 23:32:23 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> We'd need to be triply confident that we know better than the DBA before
> removing flexibility in back branches.
> +1 for just changing the default.

I think we do. But I also think that I pretty clearly lost this
argument, so let's just change the default.

Is anybody willing to work on this?

Something like the patches attached could be considered, one is for master and REL9_5_STABLE to remove ssl_renegotiation_limit, the second one for ~REL9_4_STABLE to change the default to 0.
Regards,
--
Michael
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PATCH: index-only scans with partial indexes
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: Removing SSL renegotiation (Was: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?)