Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqQbmKJ7UHrKfbiA0wopAWiTeo8u=_UNS6s+dxmB_JL6JQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> The specification of the recovery target parameters should be different, IMHO.
>
> If the user is performing a recovery and the target of the recovery is
> incorrectly specified then it is clear that the recovery cannot
> continue with an imprecisely specified target. So in my understanding
> we would need to either
>
> 1) issue a WARNING and pause recovery
>
> 2) issue an ERROR (which becomes FATAL in Startup process) and exit recovery
>
> My view would be 2) is the most useful, though I am willing to hear
> other points and/or go with majority view

I agree with that. 2) is more consistent with what is in core now.
-- 
Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] WARM and indirect indexes
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] WARM and indirect indexes