Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqQYxPziUaji=C+Bsu6LDX-z+AKwZamfR-y7qYZmkEWUjQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)  ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Yes, quite possibly, actually. I should've just got Haroon to build me a new
> initdb without the priv setting and with creation of crashdumps/ .
>
> It might be worth testing that out and adding an initdb startup flag to
> create the directory, since initdb is such a PITA to debug.

I was more thinking about putting that under -DDEBUG for example.
-- 
Michael

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)
Следующее
От: Corey Huinker
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Odd behavior with domains