Re: [HACKERS] Small patch for pg_basebackup argument parsing

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Small patch for pg_basebackup argument parsing
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqQOGLhGFW+1D=_WHLhaJLv+WafhHN-2n-vvo_K=Ds9-OA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] Small patch for pg_basebackup argument parsing  (Pierre Ducroquet <p.psql@pinaraf.info>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Small patch for pg_basebackup argument parsing
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 6:32 AM, Pierre Ducroquet <p.psql@pinaraf.info> wrote:
> Yesterday while doing a few pg_basebackup, I realized that the integer
> parameters were not properly checked against invalid input.
> It is not a critical issue, but this could be misleading for an user who
> writes -z max or -s 0.5…
> I've attached the patch to this mail. Should I add it to the next commit fest
> or is it not needed for such small patches ?

A call to atoi is actually equivalent to strtol with the rounding:
(int)strtol(str, (char **)NULL, 10);
So I don't think this is worth caring.

By doing a git grep "atoi(optarg)" you'll see far more places that
handle integer options this way as well...
--
Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Undefined psql variables
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] logical replication and PANIC during shutdowncheckpoint in publisher