Re: [HACKERS] exposing wait events for non-backends (was: Trackingwait event for latches)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [HACKERS] exposing wait events for non-backends (was: Trackingwait event for latches)
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqQN9YWHWaNCc2Wf1g0RuMuFtROKPx2DDYgCZ0jCAprReA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] exposing wait events for non-backends (was: Trackingwait event for latches)  (Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: exposing wait events for non-backends (was: Trackingwait event for latches)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 8:19 PM, Kuntal Ghosh
<kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hence, to be consistent with others, bgworker processes can be
> initialized from BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionBy[Oid].

Yeah, I am fine with that. Thanks for the updated versions.
-- 
Michael

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kuntal Ghosh
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] exposing wait events for non-backends (was: Trackingwait event for latches)
Следующее
От: Alexey Kondratov
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] GSOC'17 project introduction: Parallel COPY execution with errorshandling