Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
| От | Michael Paquier | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAB7nPqQCB5fWedQKALsKBeTmMMtjcuYJb1o5XFZ4eULJeQ2pnw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) | 
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 2:28 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Attached patch incorporates above comments.
>> Please find it.
>
> Attached is the latest version of the patch based on your patch.
Not really having a look at the core patch yet...
+ my $result = $node_master->psql('postgres', "SELECT
application_name, sync_priority, sync_state FROM
pg_stat_replication;");
+ print "$result \n";
Having ORDER BY application_name would be good for those queries, and
the result outputs could be made more consistent as a result.
+ # Change the s_s_names = '2[standby1,standby2,standby3]' and check sync state
+ $node_master->psql('postgres', "ALTER SYSTEM SET
synchronous_standby_names = '2[standby1,standby2,standby3]';");
+ $node_master->psql('postgres', "SELECT pg_reload_conf();");
Let's add a reload routine in PostgresNode.pm, this patch is not the
only one who would use it.
--- b/src/test/recovery/t/006_multisync_rep.pl
***************
*** 0 ****
--- 1,106 ----
+ use strict;
+ use warnings;
You may want to add a small description for this test as header.
     $postgres->AddFiles('src/backend/replication', 'repl_scanner.l',         'repl_gram.y');
+     $postgres->AddFiles('src/backend/replication', 'syncrep_scanner.l',
+         'syncrep_gram.y');
There is no need for a new routine call here, you can just append the
new files on the existing call.
-- 
Michael
		
	В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: