On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> So, we're still with zero ability to reproduce this problem enough to know
> if it's fixed, or if other issues are caused.
>
> I'm thinking maybe we should push this patch to master, to at least get a
> largeish number of runs with it on a bunch of different platforms. No
> backpatching until we've seen it run there for some time to feel more
> confident about it.
>
> Thoughts?
Yeah, I kind of agree with that. Not reacting with an ENOENT on
win32's stat() if ERROR_DELETE_PENDING is found is definitely wrong,
as is not doing the mapping in win32error.c.
--
Michael
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs