Re: Rounding to even for numeric data type

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Rounding to even for numeric data type
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqQ4pPkE8aDsKg5Kzty2o_xHH5URADJBC1twG_1--cRntw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Rounding to even for numeric data type  (James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>)
Ответы Re: Rounding to even for numeric data type  (Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 4:51 AM, James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "MP" == Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
>
> MP> So, attached is a patch that does 1) and 2) to make clear to the
> MP> user how numeric and double precision behave regarding rounding.
> MP> I am adding it to CF 2015-06 to keep track of it...
>
> Given that the examples show -2.5 rounds to -3, the IEEE term is
> roundTiesToAway, and the typical conversational english is round ties
> away from zero.

Ah, thanks for the correct wording. Fixed in the attached.

> RoundUp means mean towards +Infinity.
>
> 754 specifies that for decimal, either roundTiesToEven or roundTiesToAway
> are acceptable defaults, and which of the two applies is language dependent.
> Does ANSI SQL say anything about how numeric should round?
>
> In general, for decimals (or anything other than binary), there are
> twelve possible roundings:
>
>  ToEven ToOdd AwayFromZero ToZero Up Down
>  TiesToEven TiesToOdd TiesAwayFromZero TiesToZero TiesUp TiesDown
>
> (Up is the same as ceil(3), Down as floor(3).)

Well, I am not sure about that... But reading this thread changing the
default rounding sounds unwelcome. So it may be better to just put in
words the rounding method used now in the docs, with perhaps a mention
that this is not completely in-line with the SQL spec if that's not
the case.
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Relation extension scalability
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Relation extension scalability