On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed.90@gmail.com> wrote:
> Below are performance numbers in case of synchronous replication with and
> without fpw compression using latest version of patch(version 14). The patch
> helps improve performance considerably.
> Both master and standby are on the same machine in order to get numbers
> independent of network overhead.
So this test can be used to evaluate how shorter records influence
performance since the master waits for flush confirmation from the
standby, right?
> The compression patch helps to increase tps by 10% . It also helps reduce
> I/O to disk , latency and total runtime for a fixed number of transactions
> as shown below.
> The compression of WAL is quite high around 40%.
>
> Compression on
> off
>
> WAL generated 23037180520(~23.04MB)
> 38196743704(~38.20MB)
Isn't that GB and not MB?
> TPS 264.18 239.34
>
> Latency average 60.541 ms 66.822
> ms
>
> Latency stddev 126.567 ms 130.434
> ms
>
> Total writes to disk 145045.310 MB 192357.250MB
> Runtime 15141.0 s 16712.0 s
How many FPWs have been generated and how many dirty buffers have been
flushed for the 3 checkpoints of each test?
Any data about the CPU activity?
--
Michael