Re: Can't get Dell PE T420 (Perc H710) perform better than a MacMini with PostgreSQL

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Krupka
Тема Re: Can't get Dell PE T420 (Perc H710) perform better than a MacMini with PostgreSQL
Дата
Msg-id CAB6McgWJYjXEWtycB0bo9G+abvE1nkhh259x4AZjOdutpGCfVw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Can't get Dell PE T420 (Perc H710) perform better than a MacMini with PostgreSQL  (Pietro Pugni <pietro.pugni@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Can't get Dell PE T420 (Perc H710) perform better than a MacMini with PostgreSQL
Список pgsql-performance
Дерево обсуждения

A more simple "overview" might be "numactl —hardware”
It returns the following output:

sh-4.3# numactl --hardware
available: 2 nodes (0-1)
node 0 cpus: 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
node 0 size: 64385 MB
node 0 free: 56487 MB
node 1 cpus: 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31
node 1 size: 64508 MB
node 1 free: 62201 MB
node distances:
node   0   1 
  0:  10  20 
  1:  20  10 

Did you already post the results of:
cat /proc/sys/vm/zone_reclaim_mode

Also, how big did you say your dataset is? Based on the output of free, you're certainly not using all the memory you have.  That could be just because you haven't accessed that much of your dataset, or it could be because zone reclaim is preventing you from using your entire amount of RAM as file system cache.

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pietro Pugni
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Can't get Dell PE T420 (Perc H710) perform better than a MacMini with PostgreSQL
Следующее
От: Pietro Pugni
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Can't get Dell PE T420 (Perc H710) perform better than a MacMini with PostgreSQL