On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 at 14:22, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 08:31:28PM +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> > Those all look fine to me too.
>
> +1.
I've pushed this. I backpatched due to the typo in the fsync GUC
description. I'd have only pushed to master if it were just the
comment typos.
I noticed older versions had another instance of "insure" in a code
comment. I opted to leave that one alone since that file is now gone
in more recent versions.
David