Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Rowley
Тема Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP)
Дата
Msg-id CAApHDvrOvHqGzvOGz9dqiqXw_UxM9wEk8A+enbHWjS9Bgwj6iA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP)  (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> I've attached an updated invtrans_strictstrict_base patch which has the
> feature removed.

What is the state of play on this patch?  Is the latest version what's in
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/64F96FD9-64D1-40B9-8861-E6182029220B@phlo.org
plus this sub-patch?  Is everybody reasonably happy with it?  I don't
see it marked "ready for committer" in the CF app, but time is running
out.


As far as I know the only concern left was around the extra stats in the explain output, which I removed in the patch I attached in the previous email.

The invtrans_strictstrict_base.patch in my previous email replaces the invtrans_strictstrict_base_038070.patch in that Florian sent here http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/64F96FD9-64D1-40B9-8861-E6182029220B@phlo.org all of the other patches are unchanged so it's save to use Florian's latest ones

Perhaps Dean can confirm that there's nothing else outstanding?

 
                        regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP)
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Minimum supported version of Python?