Re: ORDER BY pushdowns seem broken in postgres_fdw

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Rowley
Тема Re: ORDER BY pushdowns seem broken in postgres_fdw
Дата
Msg-id CAApHDvrOrvY3j3uMaa8hVCyAzNKZuDZK-2dNe3zm-u+VB=QGkw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: ORDER BY pushdowns seem broken in postgres_fdw  (Ronan Dunklau <ronan.dunklau@aiven.io>)
Ответы Re: ORDER BY pushdowns seem broken in postgres_fdw
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 at 19:00, Ronan Dunklau <ronan.dunklau@aiven.io> wrote:
> Please find it reattached.

+-- This will not be pushed either
+explain verbose select * from ft2 order by c1 using operator(public.<^);
+                                  QUERY PLAN
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Sort  (cost=190.83..193.33 rows=1000 width=142)


Can you also use explain (verbose, costs off) the same as the other
tests in that area.  Having the costs there would never survive a run
of the buildfarm. Different hardware will produce different costs, e.g
32-bit hardware might cost cheaper due to narrower widths.

History lesson: costs off was added so we could test plans. Before
that, I don't think that the regression tests had any coverage for
plans.  Older test files still likely lack much testing with EXPLAIN.

David



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ronan Dunklau
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: postgres_fdw: Handle boolean comparison predicates
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: A (but copied many) typo of char-mapping tables