On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at 20:42, Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> In 5543677ec9 we introduced an optimization that uses Limit instead of
> Unique to implement DISTINCT when all the DISTINCT pathkeys have been
> marked as redundant. I happened to notice that this optimization was
> not applied to partial DISTINCT, which I think should be.
It seems very likely that the parallel plan would only be chosen if
the planner estimated there'd just be 1 row before the distinct.
Otherwise, the non-partial path's LIMIT would come out so cheap that
it would be unlikely that the parallel plan would be picked.
I think your test case only chooses the parallel plan because you're
doing FROM tenk1 WHERE four=4. And that column only contains values
0..3.
However, having said that. Parallel plans are often picked when there
is some highly selective qual as parallel_tuple_cost has to be applied
to fewer tuples for such plans, so probably this is worth doing.
David