Re: Incremental sort for access method with ordered scan support (amcanorderbyop)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Rowley
Тема Re: Incremental sort for access method with ordered scan support (amcanorderbyop)
Дата
Msg-id CAApHDvqNHLGBbOYTLq00cGPDX9XCC_LvZdR2zoix6z2qSkqNCw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Incremental sort for access method with ordered scan support (amcanorderbyop)  (Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Incremental sort for access method with ordered scan support (amcanorderbyop)  (Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 4 Jul 2023 at 20:12, Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> wrote:
> The v4 patch looks good to me (maybe some cosmetic tweaks are still
> needed for the comments).  I think it's now 'Ready for Committer'.

I agree. I went and hit the comments with a large hammer and while
there also adjusted the regression tests. I didn't think having "t" as
a table name was a good idea as it seems like a name with a high risk
of conflicting with a concurrently running test. Also, there didn't
seem to be much need to insert data into that table as the tests
didn't query any of it.

The only other small tweak I made was to not call list_copy_head()
when the list does not need to be shortened. It's likely not that
important, but if the majority of cases are not partial matches, then
we'd otherwise be needlessly making copies of the list.

I pushed the adjusted patch.

David



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Drouvot, Bertrand"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Autogenerate some wait events code and documentation
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: brininsert optimization opportunity