Re: JIT compilation per plan node
| От | David Rowley |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: JIT compilation per plan node |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAApHDvqMWpwHjCP0H+xJS15LwnApYNY0hn6ya9EQF4RSv+oK6A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: JIT compilation per plan node (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: JIT compilation per plan node
Re: JIT compilation per plan node |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 18:31, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > FWIW, I seriously doubt that an extra walk of the plan tree is even > measurable compared to the number of cycles JIT compilation will > expend if it's called. So I don't buy your argument here. > We would be better off to do this in a way that's clean and doesn't > add overhead for non-JIT-enabled builds. The extra walk of the tree would need to be done for every plan, not just the ones where we do JIT. I'd rather find a way to not add this extra plan tree walk, especially since the vast majority of cases on an average instance won't be doing any JIT. David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: