Re: Docs pg_restore: Shouldn't there be a note about -n ?
| От | David Rowley |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Docs pg_restore: Shouldn't there be a note about -n ? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAApHDvqG7_ctYrdhLv+v5W9561kyHsEv7GZrgHGCmVux9KK7+Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Docs pg_restore: Shouldn't there be a note about -n ? (Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Docs pg_restore: Shouldn't there be a note about -n ?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 at 05:32, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> wrote: > > On 2024-Sep-26, Florents Tselai wrote: > > but the -e note on the distinction between installing binaries / creating > > an extension I think it's important. > > Hmm, ok, but I think that's a slightly unrelated topic because the shlib > is not a database object. Maybe it would be more appropriate to add a > mention of this directly in the docs for -e instead of trying to cram it > in the note about other database objects. I'll wait for you to propose > something for that part. This seems to be waiting on Florents. I've adjusted the CF entry to reflect that. Florents, are you planning on coming back to this? David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: