Re: BUG #18558: ALTER PUBLICATION fails with unhelpful error on attempt to use system column
От | David Rowley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #18558: ALTER PUBLICATION fails with unhelpful error on attempt to use system column |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAApHDvpw2r1XS4LaN90dkfaSOsWuyj_HDevV6avtn+EMe1fUxQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #18558: ALTER PUBLICATION fails with unhelpful error on attempt to use system column (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #18558: ALTER PUBLICATION fails with unhelpful error on attempt to use system column
Re: BUG #18558: ALTER PUBLICATION fails with unhelpful error on attempt to use system column |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 at 16:52, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 5:45 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote: > > Here's the patch updated to do the validation inside AlterPublicationTables(). > > I think we've come full circle -- your fix is now pretty much the same > as my v3 patch [1]. Thanks for having a look at the patch. I don't agree that this is full circle. My motivation for the additional changes is the API cleanliness of the function you're making extern. I mentioned this in my 2nd paragraph in [1]. I didn't like that you wanted to make the external function populate an array and a Bitmapset with the same information. I think just having the Bitmapset is fine and the array adds needless overhead and confusion. As for this being backpatched or not. For me, about 51% of me thinks this is fine for a master-only fix. Does anyone else have any thoughts about back-patching the fix? David [1] https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvo2i1j_iCFcURx5q7jYe70qk4Ca7J+8Dt9_jSMOdooAOA@mail.gmail.com
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: