On Fri, 7 Nov 2025 at 01:47, Mats Kindahl <mats.kindahl@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I agree with Amit that there doesn't seem to be a need to free
> > pubnames.data. We're already leaking publist, for instance. This is
> > okay since we only call these functions during DDL, which in general is
> > not sensitive to leaks.
>
> Seems reasonable. Here is an updated version that removes the pfree() calls.
Sounds like all are in favour. Pushed.
David