On Sat, 6 Jul 2024 at 12:08, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> The attached fixes the issue. I'll stare at it a bit more and try to
> decide if that's the best way to fix it.
I did that staring work and thought about arranging the code to reduce
the number of #ifdefs. In the end, I decided it was better to keep the
two "if" checks close together so that it's easy to see that one does
> and the other >=. Someone else's tastes may vary.
I adjusted the comment to remove the >= mention and pushed the
resulting patch and backpatched to 16, where I broke this in
0e480385e.
Thanks for the report.
David
David