Re: Possible documentation inaccuracy in optimizer README

On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 14:33, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Maybe better:
>
>         Other possibilities will be excluded for lack of join clauses.
>         (In reality, use of EquivalenceClasses would allow us to
>         deduce additional join clauses that allow more join
>         combinations, but here we ignore that to preserve the
>         simplicity of this example.)

Looks good to me.

David