On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 19:08, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> I ran another scale=5 TPCH benchmark on v4 against f859c2ffa using gcc
> 9.3. I'm unable to see any gains with this, however, the results were
> pretty noisy. I only ran pgbench for 60 seconds per query. I'll likely
> need to run that a bit longer. I'll do that tonight.
I've attached the results of a TPCH scale=5 run master (f859c2ffa) vs
master + elog_ereport_attribute_cold_v4.patch
It does not look great. The patched version seems to have done about
1.17% less work than master did.
David