пт, 9 авг. 2019 г. в 10:23, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>:
>
> At Fri, 9 Aug 2019 09:56:27 +0300, Dmitry Igrishin <dmitigr@gmail.com> wrote in
<CAAfz9KPZbPjoWTqOb5moi_YWvdbSjAMZsrVBW0cBw33Q560CLw@mail.gmail.com>
> > пт, 9 авг. 2019 г. в 05:45, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 10:46:07PM +0300, Dmitry Igrishin wrote:
> > > > This looks nice for a Perl hacker :-). As for me, it looks unusual and
> > > > a bit confusing. I never
> > > > programmed in Perl, but I was able to quickly understand where the
> > > > problem lies due to the
> > > > style adopted in other languages, when the contents are enclosed in
> > > > quotation marks, and
> > > > the quotation marks are escaped if they are part of the contents.
> > > > So, should I fix it? Any thoughts?
> > >
> > > FWIW, I like Alvaro's suggestion about qq{} in this case, as it makes
> > > sure that double-quotes are correctly applied where they should.
> > The attached 4rd version of the patch uses qq||. I used qq|| instead
> > of qq{} for consistency because qq|| is already used in Solution.pm:
> >
> > return qq|VisualStudioVersion = $self->{VisualStudioVersion}
> > MinimumVisualStudioVersion = $self->{MinimumVisualStudioVersion}
> > |;
>
> Hmm. qq is nice but '|' make my eyes twitch (a bit). Couldn't we
> use other delimites like (), ##, or // ? (I like {} for use in
> this patch.)
>
> Any opinions?
Personally I don't care. I used || notation only in order to be
consistent, since this notation is already used in Solution.pm. If
this consistency is not required let me provide a patch with {}
notation. What do you think?