Re: Do we need yet another IDE (SQL development assistant) for PostgreSQL?

Поиск

Список

Период

Сортировка

От	Dmitry Igrishin
Тема	Re: Do we need yet another IDE (SQL development assistant) for PostgreSQL?
Дата	16 июля 2018 г. 03:11:31
Msg-id	CAAfz9KMNPJDKe=2TZ7q3coSGEg8U=8dj2SM=xLkE3KtvhKk3=A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на	Re: Do we need yet another IDE (SQL development assistant) for PostgreSQL? (Ravi Krishna <sravikrishna3@gmail.com>)
Список	pgsql-general

вс, 15 июл. 2018 г. в 23:51, Ravi Krishna <sravikrishna3@gmail.com>:

1. dbeaver covers many DBMS and even nosql. Many shops are not one product specific. That is definitely a plus.

On the other hand it is hard to support unique features of PostgreSQL in a tool that attempts to cover all the world.

I can't say about DBeaver, but as a rule, cool-abstracted-cross-DBMS-drivers are often limited and don't support many

unique features of a concrete DBMS.

2. Lightweight tool which can run even from command line will be a plus for the product you are thinking to develop.

Yes. In fact, I have a prototype of such a tool, and use it from command line are useful. For example,

if I run it in *compilation* buffer of Emacs, I can easily navigate to the place of error occured at the time of

database/schema deployment.

3. Who cares in what language it is developed?

Many people, in fact. The reasons are different.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

От: Ravi Krishna
Дата: 16 июля 2018 г., 02:50:44
Сообщение: Re: Do we need yet another IDE (SQL development assistant) for PostgreSQL?

От: Martin Mueller
Дата: 16 июля 2018 г., 04:12:15
Сообщение: Re: two instances of postgres on the same machine?