Re: JSON for PG 9.2

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter van Hardenberg
Тема Re: JSON for PG 9.2
Дата
Msg-id CAAcg=kV+mfHGf7qkgNoLi00aKYE1aF1suV6krHgD1nsYfa1_Gw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: JSON for PG 9.2  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: JSON for PG 9.2  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On mån, 2011-12-12 at 16:51 -0800, Peter van Hardenberg wrote:
> You don't need a new PL to do that.  The existing PLs can also parse
> JSON.  So that's not nearly enough of a reason to consider adding this
> new PL.

PL/V8 is interesting because it is very fast, sandboxed, and well
embedded with little overhead.

My experience with PL/Python and PL/Perl has not been thus, and
although they are handy if you want to break out and run system work,
they're not the kind of thing I'd consider for defining performant
operators with.

I feel PL/V8 has promise in that area.

--
Peter van Hardenberg
San Francisco, California
"Everything was beautiful, and nothing hurt." -- Kurt Vonnegut


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter van Hardenberg
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WIP: URI connection string support for libpq
Следующее
От: Joey Adams
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: JSON for PG 9.2