Re: insert/update performance

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jinhua Luo
Тема Re: insert/update performance
Дата
Msg-id CAAc9rOx1YCAb0TSAJNPnM7t2gv_Svj3NPvGdH+9HixuVK6djUg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: insert/update performance  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

2016-01-23 18:40 GMT+08:00 Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>:
> At the moment, I am also not able to see why it is so.  You might
> want to first try with a simple test (Can you extract insert/update
> statements from application and run it manually for couple of times
> and then run Vacuum to see the result).

I try to do it manually, the issue is the same. It's weird that for
the index, the number of removed rows is correct. Just the table
itself is wrong (Sometimes it's correct too, it seems that it's a
random issue, I'm so confused).

>
> By anychance have you set a value for vacuum_defer_cleanup_age?
>

No, I do not configure it.

Regards,
Jinhua Luo



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PoC: Partial sort
Следующее
От: David Rowley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Removing Functionally Dependent GROUP BY Columns