Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От James Coleman
Тема Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
Дата
Msg-id CAAaqYe8eD_mLe0KtywKZ0dtaT8ccCVcyV855N5HZwSBgPt=Fcw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:54 AM Tomas Vondra
<tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 11:54:06AM -0400, James Coleman wrote:
> >> OK, so we have that now.  I suppose this spreadsheet now tells us which
> >> places are useful and which aren't, at least for the queries that you've
> >> tested.  Dowe that mean that we want to get the patch to consider adding
> >> paths only the places that your spreadsheet says are useful?  I'm not
> >> sure what the next steps are for this patch.
> >
> >I wanted to note here that I haven't abandoned this patch, but ended
> >up needing to use my extra time for working on a conference talk. That
> >talk is today, so I'm hoping to be able to catch up on this again
> >soon.
> >
>
> Good! I'm certainly looking forward to a new patch version.
>
> As discussed in the past, this patch is pretty sensitive (large, touches
> planning, ...), so we should try getting most of it in not too late in
> the cycle. For example 2019-11 would be nice.

Completely agree; originally I'd hoped to have it in rough draft
finished form to get serious review in the September CF...but...



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Create collation reporting the ICU locale display name
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: errbacktrace