Re: [DOCS] HOT - correct claim about indexes not referencing old line pointers

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От James Coleman
Тема Re: [DOCS] HOT - correct claim about indexes not referencing old line pointers
Дата
Msg-id CAAaqYe-V3XmkAkhnzuLgiyaCwddDEEF6bpV+xA+8FZzW9sBHuQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [DOCS] HOT - correct claim about indexes not referencing old line pointers  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 1:09 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 9:07 PM James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> wrote:
> > If the goal here is the most minimal patch possible, then please
> > commit what you proposed. I am interested in improving the document
> > further, but I don't know how to do that easily if the requirement is
> > effectively "must only change one specific detail at a time".
>
> So, yesterday I wrote a long email on how I saw the goals here.
> Despite our disagreements, I believe we agree that the text I proposed
> is better than what's there, so I've committed that change now. I've
> also marked the CF entry as committed. Please propose the other
> changes you want separately.

Thanks for committing the fix.

Regards,
James Coleman



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: James Coleman
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [DOCS] HOT - correct claim about indexes not referencing old line pointers
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_dump versus enum types, round N+1