On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> The files you link to don't make much sense to me (they do not look
> like patch diffs) but they seem to suggest hard-wiring configure results
> into the source code, which does not sound like an acceptable solution
> from our standpoint.
I've also never seen this format before, which are...ed expressions.
I guess that makes them less sensitive to line churn. Cute, but...wow.
--
fdr