Re: Cross-backend signals and administration (Was: Re: pg_terminate_backend for same-role)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Daniel Farina
Тема Re: Cross-backend signals and administration (Was: Re: pg_terminate_backend for same-role)
Дата
Msg-id CAAZKuFYQq7X8Cp4H-ionG95mgY+aNEGQUWjS3uCa4u54d3dn0A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Cross-backend signals and administration (Was: Re: pg_terminate_backend for same-role)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Cross-backend signals and administration (Was: Re: pg_terminate_backend for same-role)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> Maybe we should just not worry about this.
>
> That's been my reaction right along.  There's no evidence that PID
> recycling is a problem in the real world.

I'm entirely willing to acquiesce to that point of view.  I only
thought this was the blocker as to why pg_terminate_backend was left
out of the pg_cancel_backend patch.

In that thread, I have since posted the simpler "just let it happen" version.

--
fdr


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dimitri Fontaine
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Command Triggers, patch v11
Следующее
От: Dimitri Fontaine
Дата:
Сообщение: Command Triggers patch v18