Re: Schema version management

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joel Jacobson
Тема Re: Schema version management
Дата
Msg-id CAASwCXcLBQkxdd48kU-CfnuN6vy_-oatwz14iRcs+AiObT=0pA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Schema version management  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Schema version management  (Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
My vote is - when there's an overloaded function, put each version in
its own file.  And name the files something like
functionname_something.sql.  And just document that something may not
be entirely stable.

I would agree that's better if the dump order isn't deterministic.

However, it looks like an easy fix to make the dump order deterministic:

If the dump order is deterministic, I think its cleaner to put all versions in the same file.

Benefits:
+ Pretty looking filename
+ Same file structure for all object types, no special exception for functions

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Query from VMWare re use of PostgreSQL in new TPC-V benchmark
Следующее
От: Gurjeet Singh
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Schema version management