On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
> On 09/02/2014 04:32 PM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
>> I think it's much better to make it the default behaviour in plpgsql2
>> than to add a new syntax to plpgsql,
>> because then we don't have to argue what to call the keyword or where to
>> put it.
>
>
> Then you'll have to argue what the *other* syntax should look like. And not
> everyone agrees on the default either, see Kevin's email. Designing a new
> language is going to be an uphill battle, even more so than enhancing
> current plpgsql.
Any ideas on what the *other* syntax could look like?