Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Melanie Plageman
Тема Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Дата
Msg-id CAAKRu_aNSet=AoDpGkT6dW7f8UQAPP+HQqVP2f0OrE-Mubi_NQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)  (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)  (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 5:46 PM Melanie Plageman
<melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Besides docs, there is one large change to the code which I am currently
> working on, which is to change PgStat_IOOpCounters into an array of
> PgStatCounters instead of having individual members for each IOOp type.
> I hadn't done this previously because the additional level of nesting
> seemed confusing. However, it seems it would simplify the code quite a
> bit and is probably worth doing.

As described above, attached v43 uses an array for the PgStatCounters of
IOOps instead of struct members.

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Joseph Koshakow
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Infinite Interval
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: perl 5.36, C99, -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wshadow=compatible-local