On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 5:23 AM Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> On 30.11.22 23:34, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> > I have attached a patchset with only the code changes contained in the
> > previous patch 0003. I have broken the refactoring down into many
> > smaller pieces for ease of review.
>
> To keep this moving along a bit, I have committed your 0002, which I
> think is a nice little improvement on its own.
Thanks!
I've attached a rebased patchset - v4.
I also changed heapgettup_no_movement() to noinline (instead of inline).
David Rowley pointed out that this might make more sense given how
comparatively rare no movement scans are.
- Melanie