Re: Using read_stream in index vacuum
От | Melanie Plageman |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Using read_stream in index vacuum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAAKRu_ZSz=MkPvsdnSxeUwGtkNV8c8iS91rrO_-KPdKTyG_9=w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Using read_stream in index vacuum (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Using read_stream in index vacuum
Re: Using read_stream in index vacuum |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 3:23 PM Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've committed the btree and gist read stream users. I think we can > come back to the test after feature freeze and make sure it is super > solid. I've now committed the spgist vacuum user as well. I'll mark the CF entry as completed. I wonder if we should do GIN? > Looking at the spgist read stream user, I see you didn't convert > spgprocesspending(). It seems like you could write a callback that > uses the posting list and streamify this as well. It's probably not worth it -- since we process the pending list for each page of the index. - Melanie
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: