Re: Introduce "log_connection_stages" setting.
От | Melanie Plageman |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Introduce "log_connection_stages" setting. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAAKRu_Z5X1NsCzx6SXZQAt=XX9Vu8bmDy_gY01Zu-iiTH+ychQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Introduce "log_connection_stages" setting. (Sergey Dudoladov <sergey.dudoladov@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Introduce "log_connection_stages" setting.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 5:43 AM Sergey Dudoladov <sergey.dudoladov@gmail.com> wrote: > > I must admit I haven't seen the [1] either. Thank you for pointing that out, Bertrand. > I agree the patch from Melanie is very close to this patch. > > Melanie, do you think it is realistic to merge the v8-0001-Modularize-log_connections-output.patch from [1] during thecurrent commitfest ? I'd certainly like to merge it in 18. The patch itself needs more work, which I'm planning on doing this week. I think we have a reasonable amount of consensus on using GUC_LIST_INPUT. I am less sure about merging log_disconnections into log_connections. I think it makes sense in principle. But, in 18, when people satisfied with existing behavior change log_connections from 'on' to 'all' to comply with the new format, they will get the disconnections messages. I am still somewhat nervous about merging the patch in general and people being surprised because they didn't pay attention to the discussion and now log_connections is different and they would have -1'd if they'd been paying attention. - Melanie
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: