Re: PostgreSQL Contributor levels
| От | Melanie Plageman |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostgreSQL Contributor levels |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAAKRu_YkZC8PPBeVUvd16XktU2=NqDZXs2b=i9CxKgV2YW46wQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL Contributor levels (Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-www |
On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 6:22 PM Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net> wrote: > > To be honest, I don't think we "need" any of this, but there are some > benefits that we might achieve by doing it I think it is easy if you are already recognized as a sustained contributor to say we don't need to recognize people who have made fewer or only recent contributions. I don't have a strong feeling about whether or not we should use "distinguished" instead of "major", but I do know that waiting 2-3 years to be recognized for contributing to the community is discouraging for people. And, as for code contributions, when people say who contributed to Postgres code, they don't think, hey let me go look at the release notes for all the previous major versions one at a time and find the acknowledgements section. > (though I'd also say I'd > love to see a prototype list of what this new 3rd tier would look > like... it seems massive) Well the third tier would be listed last, so if you don't scroll forever, you won't see it. We could also make it a separate linked page, we haven't looked into how options would look yet. - Melanie
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: